home previous next

Is TM a religion?

First, do I have a hidden religious agenda?

TMers love to attack serious critics by accusing them of acting from a religious bias. So I'd like to start by saying that I do not have a religious agenda. I am not criticizing TM because it contradicts any personal religious conviction that I hold. I actually don't care that (giving away my conclusions below) TM is a religion. What I object to is that TMers deceive the public about the religious nature of TM in order to not negatively affect recruitment rates.

Another semantic sleight of hand

So, is TM in fact a religion? First, it depends on what you mean by "TM".  There are two uses of the term:

When TMers say that "TM is not a religion" they are practicing yet another mental reservation. They are mentally referring only to "TM the relaxation technique." Yet they know that the TM technique is never taught without accompanying indoctrination into "TM the spiritual teaching." As usual, they mean well; they are withholding this information "for your own good."

I assert that "TM the spiritual teaching" is an esoteric, dogmatic religious sect, controlled absolutely by the teachings of its prophet who proclaimed dogma with ex-cathedra infallibility. I'll go through that statement bit by bit...

TM is an "esoteric" teaching

I call it "esoteric" because TM has different sets of teachings depending on what level of "initiation" a person is at.  You learned just a little bit of the actual TM doctrine at the introductory lectures.  A little bit more was revealed to you during the "Three Days of Checking Following Personal Instruction."  You learned yet a little bit more at residence courses, and also at the meetings that you attended at the TM center.  It is all trickled out to you in dribs and drabs (see the first paragraph).

It's only when you become a TM teacher that the entirety of the TM doctrinal system is revealed to you. That's when you learn that you become "permeated with the essence of divine wisdom" when you perform the puja, for example.

Why do I emphasize the "esoteric" nature of TM?  Because it means that you did not fully understand what you were volunteering for when you started the basic TM course.  You were not provided the opportunity to learn what TM really teaches before learning TM. You were deceived.

TM is a "dogmatic" teaching

TM is "dogmatic" because Mahesh allowed zero discussion of and zero alteration of the doctrines he proclaimed.

Anyone who challenges TM dogma will be subject to the TM version of excommunication. In the Roman Catholic Church, excommunication means literally that you are not allowed to take communion. You are thereby completely cut off spiritually, with of course the attendant dire spiritual consequences.

TM excommunication also involves being cut off from spiritual resources. You will not be allowed to receive additional teachings, such as "advanced techniques." If you are a sidha, you will no long be allowed to fly with the other sidhas. You will not be allowed to go to residence courses, which means that you will never release those deep stresses that are keeping you from Cosmic Consciousness. You will get kicked out of MUM. You will not be allowed to become a teacher. Your entire "spiritual evolution" will grind to a halt. So in the case of TM excommunication, also, there are dire spiritual consequences

Be assured that TMers carefully toe the doctrinal line.

Mahesh was a prophet

I call Mahesh a "prophet" because he was the only authority for his doctrine. He claimed that he had revived an ancient wisdom, but the doctrine of "enlightenment through relaxation" is found nowhere else in Hinduism. He was the only one teaching it. I assert that he made it up.

Mahesh was infallible

Everything that Mahesh taught is considered to be infallible truth by TMers. There are no questions about his teachings. None.

Yes, TM is definitely a religion

TM the spiritual teaching is indeed a "religion" because it is "a set of beliefs concerning the cause, nature, and purpose of the universe, esp. when considered as the creation of a superhuman agency or agencies, usually involving devotional and ritual observances, and often containing a moral code governing the conduct of human affairs."

Yes, it has all of the above attributes. They just don't tell you. People are told that not only is TM not a religion, but that it is completely compatible with all religions. However, one of the secret esoteric teachings, and a core TM article of faith (perhaps the core TM article of faith) is that Mahesh taught the highest spiritual truth that has ever been taught on this planet!

Are these attributes of a "non-religion"?:

Does TM sound like a religion yet?

But TM doesn't demand faith!

TMers will often say that TM is not a religion because it does not demand faith.

In fact, "TM the spiritual teaching" is based completely on faith that Mahesh was in fact a teacher of spiritual truth.  Without that article of faith (it's faith because there's absolutely no evidence for it) the whole doctrinal system falls apart.

And advanced TM practitioners certainly display high levels of faith in many unlikely things, as when they believe that hopping about on foam mattresses constitutes "the first stages of levitation".  Or as when they travel to far off countries to practice "yogic flying" in large groups in an attempt to bring peace to a war-torn region by "creating coherence."  Or as when they move themselves and their families to "sidha communities" in Fairfield, and buy "vastu" houses there because a vastu house will accelerate their progress toward CC.  Or as when they become celibate TM monks and nuns. Or as when they pay for sacrifices to be made to the gods. And as when they start believing in the literal existence of demons.

But despite these strongly held radical beliefs, TMers honestly believe that they have never made any acts of faith. That was my experience also.  In retrospect, I certainly exhibited faith but I didn't think that I had faith. This is because the strong faith that is displayed by TMers is unconsciously acquired via trance and suggestion.

Another reason that TMers believe that they never take things on faith is that they think that they innocently and directly and objectively experience the truth of Mahesh's teachings before they accept them. For example, "You don't have to have faith that during the practice of TM your thoughts will become quieter and quieter until you experience a state of no mantra no thoughts, it just happens!"

The reason (you think) that you don't have to have faith that such a thing will happen is because you "innocently" experienced for yourself that such a thing happened!

Which sounds good, until you realize that there is no "innocence" whatever about your experiences during TM. You were told before learning TM exactly what your experiences were supposed to be! Then, in the three group meetings following personal instruction all of your experiences that conformed to that expectation were reinforced, while all other experiences that did not conform to expectation were discounted and responded to with reindoctrination (checking) into what the proper experience was that you should have.

For another example, after you learned the sidhis you think that you have innocently and objectively validated the truth of Mahesh's levitation technique in your own personal experience. That must be true, because you've never held "faith" that it would work. But, again, there was no innocence at all in your experience. Again, you were told what your experience should be. So you had it. And if you didn't have that experience, then you were carefully coached until you did! No "innocence" was ever allowed! 

Conclusion

Obviously, I think that TM is most definitely a full-blown religion. But, of course you decide. Does TM sound like a religion to you?

Table of Contents FAQ

[Contacting me]         

[Search this site]

home previous next

[Trademark notice]

[Copyright notice]